A checked
action list.

Fictional team practice · Edition 1 · October 2026

Use the existing participant pack beside these six slides. Keep your attempt and checks in your own notes. These materials support practice and do not record completion or connect an AI tool.

• Use the supplied fictional notes.
• Choose an approved tool, or work in a document without AI.
• Keep sending, booking and payment outside this practice.

Open the first source in the participant pack. Read the date and every source line before starting. Do not add real workplace data, account credentials or personal information. A paper or document attempt is a valid route.

• Task: turn A1–A8 into an action list for the team.
• Output: action, owner, deadline, status or dependency, source line.
• Boundary: use only the notes. Mark missing decisions as unknown.
• Questions: include up to three things the team needs to confirm.

Write or adapt this brief, then make your first attempt. Check your own result against the source before opening the guided correction. Keep the original attempt so you can explain what changed.

• Authored flawed line: Leila will book the venue and pay a deposit by 15 May.
• Source A2: Leila will ask the venue for a written quote by 15 May. Nobody has approved a booking or deposit.
• Revised action: request the written quote. Owner: Leila. Deadline: 15 May. Booking and deposit approval remain open.

The flawed line is an authored teaching example, not an observed learner or AI output. The date and owner have support, but the commitment changes. Match each action to its source. Keep any approval or dependency visible.

• Draft a new brief and action list from the Willow notes.
• Keep a change note when a later source line updates an earlier one.
• Check each owner, deadline and dependency against the source.
• Record any help you used. Keep up to three open questions.

Use the second source and blank table in the same participant pack. Keep the source beside your result. Ask for a format adjustment if needed. Record factual hints separately so you can distinguish an independent attempt from an attempt with help. No corrected Willow answers appear in this slide resource.

• Input: the approved notes and a clear purpose.
• Method: draft the list, then compare every claim with its source.
• Missing or conflicting facts: mark them and ask before acting.
• Final decision: a person reviews the result before anyone sends or commits.

Use the workflow card in the participant pack. Name the facts you will check, who makes the final decision and the next small task where you could use the method. Keep your result in your own document. This resource does not measure learning, deliver messages or confirm a live workshop booking.